Tax, Centrelink, ABN and GST


Do we have to pay tax on Units?

Generally no. The Commissioner for Taxation has to date exhibited no interest in taxing ordinary LETS members anywhere in Australia. The Australian Tax Office (ATO) knows all about us, of course. The taxation ruling, IT 2668A, is still valid and explains things carefully. Section 11 is the part that applies to us unless we are in business. They call us a “community-based countertrade organisation.”

11. By way of contrast, consideration which is merely the proceeds of a hobby, pastime, domestic or social arrangement, or the receipt of a windfall gain would not fall within the concept of income in subsection 25(1). For example, neighbours who exchange some home-grown vegetables over the back fence will not have derived income in terms of subsection 25(1). Also, benefits derived from the use of informal babysitting clubs would not fall for assessment under subsection 25(1). It is noted that a large proportion of transactions made through community-based countertrade organisations would not fall within the concept of income in subsection 25(1). Only those transactions within these organisations which arise from the carrying on of a business or the provision of skilled services would generally fall for consideration as assessable income.

The general principle is that, whether for money or LETS Units, “assessable income” is defined in relation to one’s regular income and not to sundry informal or amateur hobby or back-yard transactions. The point is that if the income is assessable, the expenses of earning that income are deductable. Obviously, the Commissioner doesn’t want any claims where the expenses exceed the income. On the other hand, if a business like a plumber’s receives plumbing income as LETS Units, it’s just as taxable as if the plumber was paid in dollars. (The ATO already cheerfully assumes that a Unit is equivalent to a dollar, for their purposes.) So a friendly plumber who does plumbing work for Units is entirely justified in asking for some percentage (income tax or GST) of the bill to be paid in dollars, because the ATO won’t accept Units. The page explaining how businesses must treat LETS Units, is Bartering and barter exchanges.

As far as superannuation assets are concerned, see paragraph 132 of Self Managed Superannuation Funds Ruling SMSFR 2010/1.

132. The Commissioner considers trade dollars or barter credits are assets other than money. Trade dollars or barter credits can generally only be exchanged for goods and services. As such, they are not unconditional, nor convertible to cash, and have no assigned monetary value. In addition, credit units arising from barter and counter trade transactions are not acceptable forms of payment for parties external to the bartering arrangements.

Will it affect my Centrelink payments?

No, although Centrelink have not given anybody an unequivocal statement, as far as we are aware, there has never been any threat that LETS income will ever be counted. Certainly Centrelink’s regular interrogations never mention income in alternative currency, although they enquire in great detail about assets, trusts, rentals, bonds and cash at hand. You can be sure that the Centrelink gnomes are as well aware of countertrade organisations as those in the Tax Office.

How about GST?

The same principle applies to GST. If the income is “assessable” GST must be paid, but it’s recoverable against the GST cost of any expenses. The ATO prefers not to bother. The ruling on GST for businesses in barter is Goods and services tax: the GST implications of transactions between members of a barter scheme conducted by a trade exchange GSTR 2003/14. Section 17 explains that amateurs don’t have to worry.

17. The community-based schemes are usually run on a non-profit basis and their membership may consist of individuals, businesses or other organisations. Members of community-based schemes are often not registered or required to be registered for GST or do not make supplies in the course or furtherance of their enterprise. However, where members of community-based schemes are registered or required to be registered for GST and make supplies in the course or furtherance of their enterprise, this Ruling applies to them.

BrisLETS ABN – 37 024 958 224
BrisLETS was incorporated on 8 December 1995 (IA 16070)

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Tax, Centrelink, ABN and GST

  1. Hi My name is Sylvia and I’m a member of LETS. I see that my comment is being published under the name of my blog. I hope this is ok. Regarding the ATO, it might be of interest to LETS members to know that you can request a Private Ruling from the ATO that allows you to rent rooms out to pay the mortgage without needing to declare it to Centrelink as income. We have survived this way for a few years. Also I wonder if anyone else follows the conversation about Universal Basic Income? It would make such a huge difference to our lives and could be the answer to some of the many problems that beset communities in Australia.

  2. Interesting blog name, Sylvia – no problems.
    A Private Ruling? How discriminatory is that? So only the those with the wherewithal get the deal…. But well done and good on you.
    Beware the UBI – it’ll be the opiate of the people if, having been lifted ouy of poverty, they don’t use it to reform the monetary system and everything else that gives the wealthy a differential advantage.

    1. In reply to ROYHANFLING what made it even better was it only took one phone call to the ATO. It is applied to interest paid on mortgages. I was sent a detailed copy summarising the phone call which stated that I was even making a slight loss when everything was taken into account. After that, I got one call from Centrelink asking me to let them know if anything changes. The ATO trumps Centrelink.

    2. Re the UBI. McGregor’s ‘Theory X and Theory Y’ springs to mind, as always during discussions like these. Will people squander their new found survival? I would be one of the Theory Y types of manager, believing that people will become self-motivated and haul themselves out of poverty, if things like inter-generational trauma are addressed.

      1. I’ve found the ATO people quite kind, too… But recently I heard they’ve been going after small businesses.
        I assume/that ruling only applies to one’s principle place of residence?
        The ATO treated my home (and sole property) as an investment property when I moved for employment reasons, and wouldn’t accept the expense of living elsewhere as a deduction on the rental income from the home. In other words, it treats the owner of a single property the same way as someone with multiple properties. It makes moving for employment expensive.
        Re UBI, I’d say there will be a cross section of people responding differently to it… Overall an improvement in well being, but that’s the conundrum… I don’t know how many people understand the problem with the current debt-issued bank money system.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s